Enter your keyword

Textus. English Studies in Italy

First published in 1988, Textus is the leading journal of English Studies in Italy. Peer reviewed and indexed by the main international databases, it is dedicated to promoting scholarly exchange among Italian and international researchers. Each issue is jointly edited by an Italian and a foreign scholar of international standing and addresses a topical area of language, literature and cultural studies. With its unique coverage of English studies in Italy, Textus is a forum for new critical and theoretical approaches and an invaluable resource for academic research and teaching.

Editor in Chief
Carlo M. Bajetta (Università della Valle D’Aosta)

Editorial Board
Silvia Bruti (Università di Pisa), Stefania Maria Maci (Università degli Studi di Bergamo) e Massimo Sturiale (Università degli Studi di Catania) – English Language Issue
Silvia Antosa (Università per Stranieri di Siena) e Elisabetta Marino (Università degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata”) –  English Cultural Studies Issue
Carlo M. Bajetta (Università della Valle D’Aosta) e Rocco Coronato (Università degli Studi di Padova) – English Literature Issue

Issues

The tables of contents of the latest and previous issues are available on the publisher’s website:  Textus – English Studies in Italy.

The latest issue of Textus (2022) Oscar Wilde in the Third Millennium: Approaches, Directions, Re-evaluations, Vol.: XXXV, 2.

The proposal should include the topic, the names of the editors (member editor, international guest editor and copy editor) and an abstract (500 words max.).Members interested in editing an issue of Textus must send a proposal to the Editorial Board.

StylesheetTextus_Stylesheet

***Call for Papers***

TEXTUS. ENGLISH STUDIES IN ITALY n. 3 (2023) – Literature Issue

Christopher Marlowe: Texts, Contexts, Meanings

Member Editor: Dr Cristiano Ragni (University of Verona)
International Guest Editor: Dr Andrew Duxfield (University of Liverpool)
Copy Editor: Dr Michael Davies (University of Liverpool)

Deadline for abstracts: 20 December 2022
Acceptance of abstracts to be notified by 20 January 2023
Deadline for articles: 20 February 2023

Please submit your abstract of around 500 words to:
cristiano.ragni@univr.it; A.Duxfield@liverpool.ac.uk

When the Romantics re-discovered Christopher Marlowe (1564-1593) after two centuries of oblivion, they gave
new life to a dramatic and poetic output that had enjoyed much success during the writer’s lifetime: Dido, Queen of
Carthage (probably written with Thomas Nashe), Tamburlaine the Great, Doctor Faustus, The Jew of Malta, Edward
II, and The Massacre at Paris, but also the first English translations of Ovid’s Amores and Lucan’s Bellum Civile, the
epyllion Hero and Leander, and the poem “The Passionate Shepherd to His Love”. At the same time, the Romantics
also presented the rumours that Marlowe the successful playwright-poet-translator had been a spy, an atheist, and
a sodomite in a different light. Considering themselves talented authors relegated to the margins of society
because of their extravagance by the hypocrisy of their contemporaries, the Romantics ended up celebrating
Marlowe as a subversive outcast and their own precursor. No wonder that it was precisely this “mythic reputation”
that has fascinated modernity the most, and somehow continues to thrive in popular culture, together with the
‘conspiracy theories’ according to which Marlowe was the secret hand behind Shakespeare’s works.
With its reappraisal of the multifaceted “Marlovian landscape”, recent scholarship has moved away from the
“mythologies” surrounding Marlowe. From the contributions on the significance of the poetic revolution he
inaugurated to the learned insights into his continental and classical influences or his engagement with the other
Elizabethan poets and playwrights, as well as the social and political issues that frame him as writer, contemporary
scholarship has proved to be more and more interested in factual clues, so as better to understand Marlowe’s rich
literary legacy.
Following in the footstep of such scholarship, the aim of this special issue is to focus on Marlowe’s texts, which
have often risked being sidelined in wider cultural and political debates, and the contexts that made it possible for
Marlowe to be(come) the playwright, poet, and translator that he was, so as to shed new light on the meanings of
his dramatic and poetic works. In light of these considerations, the present special issue intends to focus on these
macro areas of research:
– Marlowe’s works in the light of early modern textual and theatrical theories and practices;
– Marlowe’s works and their (possible) sources and/or intertexts;
– Marlowe’s works in relation to other literary, dramatic, and intellectual trends;
– Issues of authorship in Marlowe’s works;
– Marlowe and the other early modern poets and playwrights: collaboration and/or rivalry;
– The interconnectedness between Marlowe’s translations and plays;
– The reception/adaptation of Marlowe’s works in later English-speaking culture and literature;
– The reception/adaptation of Marlowe’s works in non-English speaking cultures.

References

Bartels, E.C. and Smith, E. (eds.) (2013). Christopher Marlowe in Context, Cambridge, CUP.
Brown Kuriyama, C. (2002). Christopher Marlowe. A Renaissance Life. Ithaca – London: Cornell University Press.
Cadman, D. and Duxfield, A. (eds.) (2014). Christopher Marlowe: Identities, Traditions, Afterlives. Special Issue of
Early Modern Literary Studies. 23.
Camerlingo, R. (1999). Teatro e Teologia. Marlowe, Bruno e i Puritani. Liguori: Napoli.
Cheney, P. (1997). Marlowe’s Counterfeit Profession: Ovid, Spenser, Counter-Nationhood. Toronto: Toronto
University Press.
Cheney, P. (ed.) (2004). The Cambridge Companion to Christopher Marlowe. Cambridge: CUP.
Cheney, P. and Hardie, P. (eds.) (2015). The Oxford History of Classical Reception in English Literature. Volume II:
1558 – 1660. Oxford: OUP.
Dabbs, T. (1991). Reforming Marlowe. The Nineteenth-century Canonization of a Renaissance Dramatist. London –
Toronto: Associated University Presses.
Downie, J.A. and Parnell, J.T. (eds.) (2000). Constructing Christopher Marlowe. Cambridge: CUP.
Duxfield, A. (2015). Christopher Marlowe and the Failure to Unify. London: Routledge.
Friedenreich, K., Gill, R. and Brown Kuriyama, C. (eds.) (1987), “A Poet and a Filthy Playmaker”: New Essays on
Christopher Marlowe. New York: AMS Press.
Grantley D. and Roberts P. (eds.) (1996). Christopher Marlowe and English Renaissance Culture. Aldershot: Scholar
Press.
Hopkins, L. (2008). Christopher Marlowe, Renaissance Dramatist. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Logan, R.A. (2007). Shakespeare’s Marlowe. The influence of Christopher Marlowe on Shakespeare’s Artistry.
Farnham: Ashgate.
Logan, R.A. (ed.) (2010). The Jew of Malta: A Critical Reader. London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare.
Lunney, R. and Craig, H. (2020). “Who Wrote Dido, Queen of Carthage?” Journal of Marlowe Studies. 1: 1-31.
McInnis, D. (ed.) (2020). Tamburlaine the Great: A Critical Reader. London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare.
Melnikoff, K. (ed.) (2017). Edward II: A Critical Reader. London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare.
Munson Deats, S. and Logan, R.A. (eds.) (2002). Marlowe’s Empery: Expanding His Critical Contexts. Newark, DE:
University of Delware Press.
Munson Deats, S. (ed.) (2010). Doctor Faustus: A Critical Guide. London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare.
Munson Deats, S. ans Logan, R.A. (eds.) (2008). Placing the Plays of Christopher Marlowe. Fresh Cultural Contexts.
Farnham: Ashgate.
Munson Deats, S. and Logan, E.A. (eds.) (2015). Christopher Marlowe at 450. Farnham: Ashgate.
Paleit, E. (2013). War, Liberty, and Caesar. Responses to Lucan’s Bellum Ciuile, ca. 1580-1650. Oxford: OUP.
Preedy, C. (2014). Marlowe’s Literary Skepticism: Politic Religion and Post-Reformation Polemic. London:
Bloomsbury.
Rhodes, N. (2013). “Marlowe and the Greeks”. Renaissance Studies. 27, 2: 199-218.
Rutter, T. (ed.) (2012). The Cambridge Introduction to Christopher Marlowe, Cambridge: CUP.
Sacerdoti, G. (2016). “Le dannabili opinioni di Christopher Marlowe. L’Anticristianesimo rinascimentale tra guerre di
religione, nuova filosofia e fonti pagane”. Rinascimento. LVI: 2016: 77-122.
Scott S.K. and Stapleton, M.L. (eds.) (2010). Christopher Marlowe the Craftsman. Lives, Stage, and Page. Farnham:
Ashgate.
Stapleton M.L. (2014), Marlowe’s Ovid. The Elegies in the Marlowe Canon. New York: Routledge.
Wells, S. (2007). Shakespeare & Co.: Christopher Marlowe, Thomas Dekker, Ben Jonson, Thomas Middleton, John
Fletcher and the Other Players in His Story. London: Penguin.